Blog Posts


Landmark Victory for Property Owner in NJ Tax Foreclosure Case


In a December 2023 published decision, the Appellate Division affirmed a trial court ruling where we successfully vacated a tax foreclosure judgment entered against our client and recovered his commercial mix-use property valued in excess of $450,000 more than the amount of the tax lien.  The Court agreed that a recent United States Supreme Court ...

Posted by , March 16, 2024 • Foreclosure

Firm Rescues Property Owner from Tax Foreclosure Debacle


Firm Rescues Property Owner from Tax Foreclosure Debacle ...

Posted by , May 20, 2022 • Foreclosure, Real Estate

Commercial Condo Owner Prevails in Claim to Recover Property After Foreclosure by Association


...

Posted by , August 16, 2020 • Foreclosure, Litigation, Real Estate

Tax Foreclosure Judgment Vacated Due To Trial Court’s Failure To Schedule Oral Argument


The trial court committed error by failing to schedule oral argument concerning a contested motion for entry of final judgment in a tax foreclosure suit. The Appellate Division vacated the judgment for this reason. The defendant, a sophisticated tax sale investor, opposed plaintiff's motion for final judgment, saying it needed time to remediate ...

Posted by , June 8, 2019 • Foreclosure, Litigation

Contact Information

Address
411 Hackensack Avenue
Hackensack, NJ 07601

Phone Number
(201) 870-4938


icono

Awards: Best Law Firms Metro Region New Jersey • New Jersey Super Lawyers • Best Lawyers in America • 201 Bergen Magazine • Avvo Top 10 Lawyer

© 1997 – 2023   Shapiro, Croland, Reiser, Apfel, & Di Iorio, LLP. All rights reserved. All rights reserved. Advertising Disclaimer: This web site constitutes an ADVERTISEMENT. Before making your choice of attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. If you believe this web site is inaccurate or misleading, you may report same to the Committee on Attorney Advertising, Hughes Justice Complex, CN 037, Trenton, N.J. 08625. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.