Imposing Personal Liability on Business Officers and Owners in New Jersey
One of the primary benefits for individuals operating a business under the umbrella of a corporation or limited liability company is avoiding personal liability. As a general matter, “[t]he rule of law that has evolved in New Jersey is that the corporate form as a wholly distinct and separate entity will be upheld.” Coppa v. Taxation Div. Direc...
Tagged in: Business Tort Liablity in New Jersey, Business Tort Liablity New Jersey, Business Torts Personal Liability New Jersey, Corporate Director Liabilty New Jersey, Corporate Veil New Jersey, Director Liability Business Fraud New Jersey, Fraud Corporate Officers New Jersey, Liability Corporate Owners Business Torts NJ, Liablity Creditors Business Fraud New Jersey, NJ Consumer Fraud Act Liabliity Corporate Owners, Personal Liability Business Fraud New Jersey, Personal Liability Corporate Directors NJ, Personal Liability Corporate Officers NJ, Piercing Corporate Veil NJ, Shareholder Liabilty Business Fraud New Jersey, Tort Participation Theory NJ
NJ Supreme Court Denies Legal Fees In Contested Estate Case
In a 5 to 1 decision issued on April 26, 2016, the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed a $397,000 legal fee awarded against the surviving spouse found to have committed undue influence with respect to her late husband's estate to the detriment of the children of his first marriage. In the Matter of the Estate of Adrien J. Folcher, Case No. 2014-074...
Tagged in: American Rule New Jersey, Attorney Fees Undue Influence New Jersey, Attorney's Fees Fraud Will Contest Case NJ, Attorney's Fees Will Contest New Jersey, Fee Shifting Probate Case New Jersey Fraud, Fiduciary Fraud Attorney's Fees NJ Probate, Fraud Attorney's Fees Contested Will NJ, Fraud Legal Fees Contested Will New Jersey, Legal Fees Undue Influence New Jersey, NJ Supreme Court Attorney's Fees Undue Influence, Probate Attorneys New Jersey Fraud, Probate Lawyer Fees NJ Undue Influence, Probate Lawyers New Jersey Fraud, Probate Litigation Attorney's Fees New Jersey, Recovery of Attorney Fees in Will Contest Cases NJ
Effect Of Bankruptcy Discharge On Creditor’s Standing To Sue Transferee Under New Jersey’s Fraudulent Transfer Act
Picture this scenario: A debtor transfers his assets to his wife to avoid a creditor's judgment. The debtor then discharges the creditor's judgment in a chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Can the creditor independently sue the debtor's wife under New Jersey’s Fraudulent Transfer Act (“NJUFTA”), N.J.S.A. 25:2-20 et seq., to avoid the asset transfer e...
Tagged in: bankruptcy discharge fraudulent transfer, credit claim against transferee, extinguish debt to sue fraudulent transfer, fraudulent conveyance attorney nj, fraudulent transfer assets standing to sue nj, fraudulent transfer attorneys nj, fraudulent transfer transferee nj, N.J.S.A. 25:2-1(b), n.j.s.a. 25:2-20, new jersey uniform fraudulent transfer act, njufta
New Jersey Appeals Court Confirms Statute of Limitations In Fraudulent Asset Transfer Claims
In a published decision issued on January 12, 2016, the New Jersey Appellate Division confirmed that the same 4-year statute of limitations period for asserting fraudulent asset transfer claims applies in commercial transactions and tort claims regardless whether or not the creditor has obtained a judgment. Rosario, et al. vs. Marco Construction ...