Expert Testimony Not Necessarily Limited to Scope of Report
In New Jersey can an expert witness testify beyond the scope of the subject matter of his report?
In limited circumstances the answer is yes so long as the party proffering the expert’s report did not treat the report as an adoptive admission in pretrial discovery.
The controlling case is Skibinski v. Smith, 206 N.J. Super. 349 (App. Div. 198...
An Overview of the Daubert Standard Governing Admissibility of Expert Opinions in Federal Court
Federal court practitioners and litigants must be mindful of the need to retain qualified and effective expert witnesses whose opinions satisfy the criteria for admissibility under the Federal Rules of Evidence, as initially established by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1...
Tagged in: Admission Expert Opinions Federal Rule Evidence 702, Admitting Expert Testimony Federal Court NJ, Challenging Expert Opinion Federal Court NJ, Civil Litigation Use of Experts, Contesting Expert Qualifications Daubert Hearing New Jersey, Daubert case U.S. Supreme Court, Daubert Test Experts Third Circuit, Evidence Rule 702 Admissibility of Expert Opinion, Federal Court Lawyers NJ, Federal Court Test Admission of Expert Opinions Daubert, Gatekeeper Expert Opinion Federal Court NJ, Qualified Expert Opinion New Jersey District C ourt, Specialized Expertise Expert Opinion Daubert
Expert Witness Testimony: Standard of Admissibility in NJ
In complex litigation the question often arises of whether expert testimony is necessary to prove any elements of a litigant's claims or defenses. Cases are often won and lost on the basis of expert testimony. Now that you've made the decision to hire an expert will his or her testimony be admissible at trial?
New Jersey Rule of Evidence (N.J.R.E....
Entire Controversy Doctrine: Loophole Allows For Second Bite Of The Apple
Consider this hypothetical: Plaintiff accounting firm (“Accounting Firm”) files a collection suit (“Action 1”) against defendant limited liability company (“LLC”) for nonpayment of invoices. In LLC’s answer to the Accounting Firm’s Complaint, LLC raises professional negligence as an “affirmative defense.” LLC fails to retain...
Tagged in: accountant collection action, Accountants book account, Affidavit of Merit, application of new jersey's entire controversy doctrine, Book Account, circumventing entire controversy doctrine, Entire Controversy Doctrine, entire controversy doctrine loophole, entire controversy doctrine prevents litigants from getting two bites of the apple, entire controversy doctrine second bite of apple, entire controversy doctrine's application to cases pending simultaneously, extending discovery deadlines, failure to serve expert report, malpractice claims arising out of core set of facts, subsequent proceedings subject to entire controversy doctrine