An Overview of the Daubert Standard Governing Admissibility of Expert Opinions in Federal Court
Federal court practitioners and litigants must be mindful of the need to retain qualified and effective expert witnesses whose opinions satisfy the criteria for admissibility under the Federal Rules of Evidence, as initially established by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1...
Tagged in: Admission Expert Opinions Federal Rule Evidence 702, Admitting Expert Testimony Federal Court NJ, Challenging Expert Opinion Federal Court NJ, Civil Litigation Use of Experts, Contesting Expert Qualifications Daubert Hearing New Jersey, Daubert case U.S. Supreme Court, Daubert Test Experts Third Circuit, Evidence Rule 702 Admissibility of Expert Opinion, Federal Court Lawyers NJ, Federal Court Test Admission of Expert Opinions Daubert, Gatekeeper Expert Opinion Federal Court NJ, Qualified Expert Opinion New Jersey District C ourt, Specialized Expertise Expert Opinion Daubert
NJ Foreclosure Law: Joinder of Non-Owner Spouse in Residential Foreclosure Cases
Joinder of Non-Owner Spouses in New Jersey Residential Foreclosure Cases
Assume the following scenario: Ralph Kramden purchases a residential investment property while single, and obtains mortgage financing to fund the purchase price. The property Deed is in Ralph's name only, as are the mortgage and promissory note that Ralph signed in favor of ...
Tagged in: Bergen County foreclosure attorneys, Bergen County foreclosure lawyers, curtesy, curtesy NJ, dismissing foreclosure complaint NJ against non-owner spouse, Dower, Dower NJ, enforcing mortgage against property owner prior to marriage NJ, foreclosure, foreclosure NJ marital residence possessory rights non-owner spouse, foreclosure NJ principal matrimonial residence, foreclosure of possessor rights in marital residence NJ law, Hackensack foreclosure attorneys, Hackensack foreclosure lawyers, N.J.S.A. 3B:28-3, New Jersey foreclosure defense attorneys, NJSA 3B:28-1, NJSA 3B:28-3, possessory rights marital residence NJ, possessory rights of non-debtor spouse, possessory rights of non-owner spouse NJ, real estate foreclosure against spouse who didn't sign mortgage NJ, suing spouse whose name is not on mortgage NJ
New Jersey Appellate Division Endorses ‘Neither Confirm Nor Deny’ Response to Public Records Request
NJ OPRA Request Exemption Recognized by NJ Appeals Court
Striking a blow to news media, and representing a victory for privacy advocates, in a landmark ruling the New Jersey Appellate Division denied the Bergen Record Newspaper's Open Public Records Act ("OPRA") request directed to the Bergen County Prosecutor demanding access to records concern...
Tagged in: exemption to disclosure of public records New Jersey, Exemption to producing public records under NJ OPRA, Freedom of the Press, neither confirm nor deny, New Jersey media lawyer, New Jersey media lawyers, NJ media attorney, NJ media attorneys, NJ media law, NJ OPRA Laws, NJ OPRA Request, Open Public Records Act Request NJ, OPRA, public records laws New Jersey, Public Records Reqest New Jersey
NJ Supreme Court Declares Law Firm’s Subsequently Recorded Mortgage Trumps Factoring Company’s Earlier Recorded Optional Advance Mortgages
Mortgage Priority Optional Advances New Jersey
In a unanimous decision issued on July 21, 2016, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Division's decision granting priority to a law firm's subsequently recorded mortgage over the pre-existing recorded mortgages held by a factoring company.
We initially reported on this case in 2015 wh...